- The committee voted to recommend to the Department of Agriculture to accept a proposal drafted by Jimmy Bush that sets up the structure for school district IPM coordinators (IPMC) to obtain their mandatory CEU credits every three years. The draft rules will allow IPMC to meet five of their six required CEUs by attending pesticide applicator training classes approved in the Pest, Lawn & ornamental, Weed control, or General IPM categories. Alternatively, an IPMC can attend a class that has been approved by the Department to meet all six hours of continuing education. All IPMCs should be relieved to finally see a decision made about this, as this is an important part of the law change that has been in limbo for the past year or so. The committee further recommended that the CEU change take effect January 1, 2011. As with all other CEU requirements on the books for TDA, it will be the responsibility of the IPMC to keep personal records of all classes attended, and to present these to an inspector on request.
- Also regarding school IPM, the committee voted to recommend to TDA a proposal to allow IPMCs put out and check sticky cards and glue boards for the purpose of assessing and monitoring pest problems in a school. Under this clarification, non-licensed IPMCs will be able to replace damaged monitors and keep track of the progress of pest control efforts between service visits.
- Mike Kelly of TDA presented a summary of the new PIER (Pesticide Inspection and Enforcement Report) system that all structural pest control inspectors will use in their site inspections of pest control businesses, non-commercial applicators, schools, lawn care companies, etc. We have been hearing rumors from schools that inspectors are coming with a "100 question inspection". I counted the questions in the school inspection template and it's more like 60-70 questions, but the idea is correct. All business and school inspections are being standardized and should become much more consistent and thorough. The questions in the laptop spreadsheet carried by inspectors have been taken directly from the law and regulations to ensure a more complete and objective assessment of a business's degree of compliance with all legal requirements. At the end of each inspection the program prints out a summary of the inspection results, showing any deficiencies that have been discovered. Depending on the significance of the deficiencies, the business or school may be issued a notice of correction, have a follow-up visit scheduled, or a penalty may be assessed. This is one change that will impact nearly everyone in the pest management industry in Texas.
- Review of WDI reports was on the agenda, but discussion was delayed until the July meeting while an industry committee assembled by TPCA President Eric Melass (Killum Pest Control, Lake Jackson, TX) prepares a report.
- Another interesting agenda item was discussion about possible modifications to requirements needed to obtain and maintain a fumigation license in Texas. Debbie Aguirre (Elite Exterminating, Corpus Christi) and Harvey West (Coastal Fumigation, Houston) both argued that, if anything, current standards should be strengthened. The committee had a discussion about the need to tighten requirements on commodity fumigation. Commodity fumigation jobs in Texas, for example, are not required to have guards and non-certified applicators are allowed to break seals on fumigation tarps. This seems like a prudent next step for TDA to take, both for agricultural and structural fumigators to reduce the risk of accidents like those that were reported recently in Utah and Texas.
Friday, April 30, 2010
Structural Pest Control Advisory Committee was enlightening and relatively productive. Here's a brief recap: